In the previous column, your columnist shared how greats like Gandhi, Ambedkar, Azad, Savitribai Phule, Vajpayee and others saw the English language as a liberating force. Today, let us continue the conversation, drawing on different voices to emphasise how English remains a vital thread in our national fabric, in spite of what Mr Amit Shah feels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Maybe Messrs. Modi and Shah might have missed what Dr Syama Prasad Mookerjee \u2013 whose 125th birth anniversary was a few days ago \u2013 had said in the Constituent Assembly: \u201cYou have got some time, fifteen years, within which English will have to be replaced. How is it to be replaced? It will have to be replaced progressively. We will have to decide realistically whether for certain special purposes English should still be continued to be used in India. As some of my friends have already stated, we might have rid India of British rule\u2014we had reasons for doing so\u2014but that is no reason why you should get rid of the English language. \u2026After all, it is on account of that language that we have been able to achieve many things. Apart from the role that English has played in unifying India politically, and thus in our attaining political freedom, it opened to us civilisations from large parts of the world. It opened to us knowledge, specially in the realm of science and technology, which it would have been difficult to achieve otherwise.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In the 1960s, there were many attempts to impose Hindi as the sole official language. Frank Anthony, a fierce advocate against this view, called English the \u201cmortar of unity\u201d. The Member of Parliament and leader of the Anglo-Indian community, fought against attempts to undermine English. Speaking during the 1961 Language Convention in Madras, he stressed that English-medium schools were the only all-India system of secondary education. His efforts, alongside leaders like C Rajagopalachari and K Subba Rao, ensured English\u2019s place in post-independent India, preventing what Rajaji called a \u201cSplit-India charter\u201d.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
In 1961, K Subba Rao, who went on to become Chief Justice of India, warned: \u201cTo force Hindi down the throats of unwilling people will certainly lead to the disintegration of the country. The best course is to maintain the status quo and to continue with English as the official language\u201d. These were pages from history. What about today.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Suresh Gopi, a minister in Narendra Modi\u2019s team, reflecting on his teacher Zita Fernandez at Infant Jesus Anglo-Indian High School in Kerala, said: \u201cYou enriched us with your talents, culture, and English language skills\u201d. His words express the gratitude of millions of Indians \u2013 including many in the current Union Cabinet \u2013 who benefited from being educated in an English-medium school.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Here is what Dr Neiphiu Rio, Chief Minister of Nagaland and staunch ally of the BJP said: \u201cIn the context of Nagaland, English is the officially declared language of the State. This designation is not recent, it is rooted in our history, where English has played a pivotal role for over a century, particularly in the domains of education, governance, and religion. English serves as vital bridges, linking us beyond our borders to the rest of India and to the wider global community.\u201d<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The language we made our own<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n English is no longer a foreign tongue, it\u2019s an Indian language, spoken with our own accents and idioms. As linguist Peggy Mohan observes, it was Dr BR Ambedkar\u2019s vision that ensured English remained \u201cequidistant from all communities\u201d, preventing linguistic dominance. Knowing English can change the economic and social trajectory of an entire family.<\/p>\n\n\n\n Yes, some people still see English as a marker of privilege. Some see it as a barrier. But when you try to shame people for speaking it, you don\u2019t just ignore history, you disregard the aspirations of millions who see English as their best chance to create opportunities, to connect, to be a part of a global language.<\/p>\n\n\n\n So again, India doesn\u2019t need less English. It needs more multilingualism. It needs more respect for Tamil, Bengali, Marathi, Hindi, Manipuri, Urdu. And alongside all this, it needs more confidence in speaking English too \u2013 without shame, without apology.<\/p>\n\n\n\n We are Indian. And we should be able to say that in any language we choose.<\/p>\n\n\n\n